by Francine Marie Tolf
Philip Gerard’s observation about a book’s structure feels spot on to me—the average reader doesn’t notice flawed structure until a book falters. As a writer of memoir, I know how vital good structure is. It keeps me in control of my material instead of the other way around. But before starting a book, I have a choice: do I plunge into my story and let structure develop organically, or do I map out a plan?
The preference seems to be to plunge in. “As far as I’m concerned, the less you know about where you’re headed, the better . . . Take your time, listen more to your heart than your head, and let your writing shape itself into what it wants to be.” Elizabeth Berg’s advice (from her book on writing, Escaping into the Open) is echoed by creative writing instructors across America. It’s advice I find immensely attractive, an approach to writing that values the act itself and removes a lot of intimidation.
But is it always better to plunge in? There are advantages to knowing where you’re headed. You’re less likely to spend weeks writing pages you will ultimately discard. What’s more, self-imposed boundaries can lead to surprisingly creative solutions. As Gerard points out in Creative Nonfiction, if you think you need absolute freedom to produce art, “you’ll find yourself at odds with most of the greatest writers who ever lived.”
Since working inside a thoughtfully planned structure is not necessarily a bad thing, I am wondering why more writers don’t practice it. I asked four memoirists whose work I admire how much planning went into their memoirs before they started writing them. Marge Barrett, Vicki Forman, Kate Hopper, and Nicole Johns were happy to share their experiences.
It turns out that neither Marge nor Nicole had any idea that they were writing full-length memoirs. “I just started writing stories of growing up, then started to think of these memories as a collection,” says Marge, who is currently revising a memoir about growing up in Marshall, Minnesota, tentatively titled Drowning in Love. “Later, I worked on finding a narrative arc to connect my childhood stories, wanting to include both the voices of the changing young girl and the present reflective woman.”
Nicole’s experience was similar. She’s the author of Purge: Rehab Diaries (Seal Press, 2009), a ForeWord Book of the Year Finalist that is already in its second printing. But Nicole didn’t know she was writing a successful memoir when she started Purge. “I was just producing material for class. I wrote the bulk and then went back and looked for narrative arc/organization/themes, et cetera. I feel like I did everything backwards!”
Kate knew she wanted a book detailing the premature birth of her daughter due to severe preeclampsia, but felt no need to impose structure at the outset. It was only after 50-some pages of what she wryly calls “vomiting as many memories, images, and scenes as possible onto my computer” that she began to discern a shape to her narrative (which is currently in revision and titled Ready for Air).
Among these four writers, Vicki is the only one who actually did some deliberate planning before beginning This Lovely Life (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2009). Her memoir about the extreme disabilities of her very premature child was the winner of the Bakeless Nonfiction Prize and has earned high praise from reviewers. “I definitely had a sense of the narrative arc, and I had a list of scenes I knew I needed to include, those that were essential. I’m not much of an ‘outliner,’ but I do make a lot of lists and they sometimes have a beginning and middle and end to them.”
So where does that leave us? Four wonderful memoirs . . . not one of which was formally outlined. Seems there’s something to be said for plunging! But that isn’t the whole story. As I considered the answers of these four writers, I was struck by how their organizing techniques echoed those listed by Vivian Gornick in her now classic guide to nonfiction writing, The Situation and the Story. While Gornick does not recommend outlining per se, she’s definitely concerned with a memoir’s structure and suggests various ways of finding it. One is to decide which memories are key and use them to organize material. This is what Vicki did at the outset and what Kate accomplished after spewing all those pages onto her hard drive. Both writers knew intuitively that certain scenes were crucial. They weren’t satisfied until they discovered what they were so they could build the rest of their books around them.
Voice, too, can impose order, says Gornick. When the narrator knows exactly who is speaking, chances are she’ll know why she’s speaking—and an authentic memoir is on its way. Marge’s need for a device that allowed her to speak persuasively as a young girl and a mature woman reveals an instinctive understanding of how the right voice can organize disparate memories.
Finally, in The Situation and the Story, Gornick addresses the question of what a book is really about. Not the subject matter, mind you, but the reason it was written. Before beginning Purge, Nicole knew about eating disorders and what it was like to be in a rehab facility for treatment of one. She also understood that research, even coupled with personal experience, wasn’t enough. Nicole had to unearth why she needed to tell her story. The bulk of Purge may have been written before she found the answer to this question—but it wasn’t shaped into a book until she did.
All four memoirists told me they were satisfied with the slow, sometimes circuitous way their books came about—the many hours and many pages of hard work it took to discover cohesive narrative. Without taking their time and trusting that form would develop in the process of writing, they are convinced they might not have been blessed with insights that found their way into their stories. “I learn so much about what I’m writing in the process of writing,” says Kate. “I think I have to write my way into the story before I can see the structure that will best serve it.”
Nicole notes that there’s “a fine line between helpful organizing and procrastination” and points out that structure and cohesion may well be “too daunting to think about when beginning a project.” She intends to write her sequel the same way she wrote Purge: by diving in and organizing chunks of writing later. But before attempting a second memoir, Marge says she would give serious thought to a few questions: “What is my purpose in writing this? What simply must be included? How to begin, end? What structure would compel the reader to move on, turning the pages?”
This sounds like a pretty good idea to me. It took me ten years to create Joliet Girl from scattered essays, more than one of which was ditched when shaping the final manuscript. Like Vicki, Kate, Nicole, and Marge, I do not regret the process, but if I’d had a clearer idea of what I wanted to accomplish with my book, it might have taken five years to complete instead of ten.
In the end, I believe there’s nothing wrong with thinking long and hard about purpose and structure before turning to that first blank page. Such planning could ultimately prove useless, but it certainly won’t smother the creative process or hinder what Vicki calls “that element of happenstance” from surfacing.
The fact is that if you’re writing honestly, you can’t not surprise yourself. I know the four gifted writers I interviewed would agree that these unexpected discoveries are what make a memoir unique and memorable for the reader—and the author.
Francine Marie Tolf is the author of Joliet Girl, a memoir, and Rain, Lilies, Luck, a full-length poetry collection, both from North Star Press of St. Cloud (2010). Her essays and poems have appeared in numerous journals. She recently received an Elizabeth George Grant and a fellowship from the Ragdale Foundation in Lake Forest, Illinois. More about Francine at www.francinemarietolf.com.
Read More...